testretreat

Risks to ad hoc personas? We don't know that perspective from personal experience, so we're just guessing. @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:46:48

By definition a composite of many people is a model. @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:45:36

Do you have intimate knowledge of your customers? How open is that communication? @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:43:16

Nominal situations or variations of normal behaviors? how these flow through the system or disrupt expectations? @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:41:17

Want persona we can relate to, but are we seeing reality or an ideal? #TestRetreat http://t.co/yTtHR2k3s0

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:37:52

People are irrational so can we design for an ideal person? Persona-based testing? More specific persona is better @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:36:11

We tend to build software around ideal situations, however we rarely work and use the software under ideals @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Alessandra Moreira (@testchick)2013-08-24 17:35:40

Are you developing for a particular client? General market? Who are they? @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:35:07

Developing software for an idealized employee/user? Or are we recognizing that we're icky sticky imperfect people? @mkltesthead #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:32:13

You didn't deliver them the product they wanted but the product they ideally envisoned. Projected needs of ideal team members #TestRetreat

— Claire Moss (@aclairefication)2013-08-24 17:30:52