PNSQC

RT @mheusser: @dhemery explaining something like ATDD to "test quality in" at #pnsqc. Really good stuff I can't fit into a tweet.

— moss drake (@mxmoss)2012-10-09 11:47:34

Test activities all by themselves do not directly change the product. @dhemery #PNSQC

— Doug (@fdreyno)2012-10-09 11:45:03

Is it testing or building quality in? Is this even a relevant distinction? @dhemery #pnsqc

— umckinney (@umckinney)2012-10-09 11:44:39

Testing quality in is partly a scheduling problem. If it comes 1st & the intent is to fix defects as they arise you might be doing it #pnsqc

— umckinney (@umckinney)2012-10-09 11:41:16

Room of test pros @ #PNSQC listening 2 @dhemery dissect testing semantics. We are enjoying but I can't imagine my biz partners enjoying.

— Ed Brothers (@EdBrothers)2012-10-09 11:40:39

RT @mkltesthead: new TESTHEAD: Day 2 of #PNSQC, Live from Portland http://t.co/AaslV2rC Live blogging Day 2. Check back regularly :). #t ...

— Thomas Ponnet (@ThomasPonnet)2012-10-09 11:38:56

new TESTHEAD: Day 2 of #PNSQC, Live from Portland http://t.co/AaslV2rC Live blogging Day 2. Check back regularly :). #testing

— Michael Larsen (@mkltesthead)2012-10-09 11:33:21

No – You can’t “test quality in” refers to quality into testing the product at the end. @dhemery #PNSQC

— Doug (@fdreyno)2012-10-09 11:31:43

@JoeyMcAllister Are you can haz here? #pnsqc #awesome

— mheusser (@mheusser)2012-10-09 11:31:41

@dhemery explaining something like ATDD to "test quality in" at #pnsqc. Really good stuff I can't fit into a tweet.

— mheusser (@mheusser)2012-10-09 11:30:13